|
Teg
|
Posts: | 92 |
Joined: | January 1970 |
Location: | |
Hub Cash: |
|
Likes: | 1 |
Website: | |
|
|
Post by Teg on Jul 30, 2014 1:09:06 GMT -5
Do you have any children? If so, how old are they, are they boys or girls. If not, do you want kids? Why?
|
|
|
lludawg
|
Posts: | 22 |
Joined: | January 1970 |
Location: | |
Hub Cash: |
|
Likes: | 3 |
Website: | |
|
|
Post by lludawg on Jul 30, 2014 1:16:12 GMT -5
I am definitely not ready for children. However in the future I really do want to have kids. One boy and one girl would be ideal. I think babies are just the cutest things ever!
|
|
|
Nick
|
Posts: | 57 |
Joined: | January 1970 |
Location: | |
Hub Cash: |
|
Likes: | 3 |
Website: | |
|
|
Post by Nick on Aug 1, 2014 12:44:42 GMT -5
Yes, an 8 year old and a 6 year old. Cats! hahaa.
They are my children. They act like it too, they are soooo spoiled. xD
But I'm not sure if I want children. But I've still got my years ahead of me. I know Carla doesn't want children, but she might change her mind later, when we are financially stable.
|
|
|
BeautifulAngel
|
Posts: | 104 |
Joined: | January 1970 |
Location: | |
Hub Cash: |
|
Likes: | 7 |
Website: | |
|
|
Post by BeautifulAngel on Aug 1, 2014 14:14:44 GMT -5
I currently do not have any kids, however in the distant future I would like to have some. I've always wanted to have kids so that I can raise them right and have a bit more hope for this society XD
|
|
|
Teg
|
Posts: | 92 |
Joined: | January 1970 |
Location: | |
Hub Cash: |
|
Likes: | 1 |
Website: | |
|
|
Post by Teg on Aug 1, 2014 15:43:25 GMT -5
Yeah BeautifulAngel, kids in today's society... well you know exactly where this is going. I have 3 kids and one on the way and I'm stopping after this one is born. My oldest is 5, her name is Torrey. The middle one, would have been 4 this year and her name was Ginny. My youngest one is 2 and his name is Wyatt. We don't know if we are having a boy or girl yet, we find out in 21 days! If we have a girl her name is going to be Chloe Jean(after both his mom and dad) Rose (after my daughter Ginny Rose). If we have a boy his name is going to be Damen Andrew(after my hubby) David(after hubby's father).
|
|
|
Deleted
|
Posts: | 0 |
Joined: | January 1970 |
Location: | |
Hub Cash: |
|
Likes: | |
Website: | |
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2014 22:32:10 GMT -5
I personally don't have children, but I have nieces and nephews. When I do have children, I would want atleast 4 or 5 of them, considering it would help keep the population in the nation atleast a little bit more stable. The decline of births in this nation sucks, because either no one wants children, or they only want 1 or 2 kids.
|
|
|
Cierra
|
Posts: | 26 |
Joined: | January 1970 |
Location: | |
Hub Cash: |
|
Likes: | 6 |
Website: | |
|
|
Post by Cierra on Aug 5, 2014 12:31:41 GMT -5
I don't have any, and I definitely don't want any.
|
|
|
Cierra
|
Posts: | 26 |
Joined: | January 1970 |
Location: | |
Hub Cash: |
|
Likes: | 6 |
Website: | |
|
|
Post by Cierra on Aug 5, 2014 12:33:38 GMT -5
I personally don't have children, but I have nieces and nephews. When I do have children, I would want atleast 4 or 5 of them, considering it would help keep the population in the nation atleast a little bit more stable. The decline of births in this nation sucks, because either no one wants children, or they only want 1 or 2 kids. Really? I've always thought that the world is overpopulated, not underpopulated.
|
|
|
Deleted
|
Posts: | 0 |
Joined: | January 1970 |
Location: | |
Hub Cash: |
|
Likes: | |
Website: | |
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2014 17:41:56 GMT -5
Technically, there is far more land available for use just IN the United States alone that is available for use, and yet, the majority of population is in cities, where there isn't much land to have a good size house for a family anyways. The birthrates in the U.S. has decreased so much, that the majority of people will have only 1 child, and maybe 2 if they want to take care of more children. That is not enough children per family to keep the natural born children high enough to keep any nation stable.
|
|
|
Cierra
|
Posts: | 26 |
Joined: | January 1970 |
Location: | |
Hub Cash: |
|
Likes: | 6 |
Website: | |
|
|
Post by Cierra on Aug 7, 2014 12:13:30 GMT -5
Oh okay, that's interesting.
|
|
|
chelonian
|
Posts: | 12 |
Joined: | January 1970 |
Location: | |
Hub Cash: |
|
Likes: | 0 |
Website: | |
|
|
Post by chelonian on Aug 14, 2014 16:31:22 GMT -5
Technically, there is far more land available for use just IN the United States alone that is available for use, and yet, the majority of population is in cities, where there isn't much land to have a good size house for a family anyways. The birthrates in the U.S. has decreased so much, that the majority of people will have only 1 child, and maybe 2 if they want to take care of more children. That is not enough children per family to keep the natural born children high enough to keep any nation stable. The anti abortionists and other religious folk seem to make up for that. Lots of oversized families in America and world wide. If people want children they should adopt instead of creating more humans to hog Earth's precious resources.
|
|